|
|
Post by Luke on Mar 20, 2006 3:12:32 GMT
Do we or do we not have rating images for the Showoff.  Becuse we could use them. Edit: Nobody better flame me.  (That includes your Crest. ;D <3...eh) |
|
|
|
Post by TROWLIN' on Mar 20, 2006 3:13:16 GMT
We had them. I'm pretty sure they took them out, because people felt bad when they got a low rate.
|
|
|
|
Post by Assassinator/Young Everest on Mar 20, 2006 7:33:20 GMT
Yeah, it was changed from 'rating' to 'critique' so you didn't need a number, people just comment on you work. To be quite honest how can you assign a number to an image?
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 20, 2006 9:15:58 GMT
What I found was most people seemed more concerened about the actual number, rather than the useful comments we gave.
|
|
|
|
Post by Happy! on Mar 20, 2006 17:16:38 GMT
>_< some people don't even care about what we give suggest on . They be like looking for a number in your post and if they don't find it all they do is like " yea thanx" and goes away. BUT! some people do care.  |
|
|
|
Post by Assassinator/Young Everest on Mar 20, 2006 17:39:26 GMT
>_< some people don't even care about what we give suggest on . They be like looking for a number in your post and if they don't find it all they do is like " yea thanx" and goes away. BUT! some people do care. like me! |
|
|
|
Post by Luke on Mar 20, 2006 19:59:26 GMT
Alright. So no rating image's becuse people didn't like getting low rates? Not our fault. We can't lie to them. |
|
|
|
Post by Josh on Mar 20, 2006 20:02:22 GMT
It's not because people don't like low rates (which is true), it is that people only look at the rating, not the actual critique. This makes posting in there pretty much useless.
|
|
|
|
Post by Happy! on Mar 20, 2006 20:11:00 GMT
It's not because people don't like low rates (which is true), it is that people only look at the rating, not the actual critique. This makes posting in there pretty much useless. Yea and they only look for the little number image nothing else. when u have numbers is like ur writing on the wall which no one really cares to read it. Only some people notice it .. Anyway iggi here is the suggestion answers in the long ago: Click Here |
|
|
|
Post by Luke on Mar 20, 2006 20:14:03 GMT
It's not because people don't like low rates (which is true), it is that people only look at the rating, not the actual critique. This makes posting in there pretty much useless. Well maybe if you kept it short rating, compared to all of the long rates that some members give out. True artist's that want to grow in their skill will take our suggestions. And I don't think the members just looking for the numbers and not the content is a good enough reason not to use them. (No offence Josh, Oliver.  |
|
|
|
Post by Josh on Mar 20, 2006 20:38:19 GMT
On the odd occasion that I do rate an image, it is a very long rate. I only do that for people that I know will appreciate it, or Terragen artists. I have always taken Terragen artists under my wing so to speak. lol.
Anyways, people just looking at the numbers is a perfect reason not to use them. Could you imagine if I rated an image and the person didn't even read what I wrote? Just the number I posted? I'd be pissed. If they don't want the rate, then they don't want to improve, and aren't really artists in my eyes.
Also, remember that numbers are pointless.
Also, Sara, us the 17 server when posting links. The majority of the forum uses it and you need to relogin to use that forum.
|
|
|
|
Post by Happy! on Mar 20, 2006 20:44:03 GMT
>_< I use both |
|
|
|
Post by Luke on Mar 20, 2006 21:02:08 GMT
On the odd occasion that I do rate an image, it is a very long rate. I only do that for people that I know will appreciate it, or Terragen artists. I have always taken Terragen artists under my wing so to speak. lol. Anyways, people just looking at the numbers is a perfect reason not to use them. Could you imagine if I rated an image and the person didn't even read what I wrote? Just the number I posted? I'd be . If they don't want the rate, then they don't want to improve, and aren't really artists in my eyes. Also, remember that numbers are pointless. Also, Sara, us the 17 server when posting links. The majority of the forum uses it and you need to relogin to use that forum. Them not reading it is their screw-up. We can get it in their heads to read the rest of the content. I say we just try it and see what happens. |
|
|
|
Post by Josh on Mar 20, 2006 21:09:34 GMT
We did try it. For at least a year. Probably longer. That is the reason they were gotten rid of. And the things that we have tried bringing back like this have all ended up with the same results as before.
|
|
|
|
Post by Luke on Mar 20, 2006 21:10:40 GMT
We did try it. For at least a year. Probably longer. That is the reason they were gotten rid of. And the things that we have tried bringing back like this have all ended up with the same results as before. Gotten rid of. ;D Okay. I guess it's not a good idea after all. Thanks for helping me out Josh my main man. |
|
|
|
Post by virtuoso on Mar 20, 2006 21:11:32 GMT
It's not just they want numbers, they want high ones. That's why many people post in tehs how off boards. Just o feel good about themselves. :/ I feel that's stupid, and maybe rating images will make it worse.
|
|
|
|
Post by Me on Mar 20, 2006 21:32:22 GMT
It's not just they want numbers, they want high ones. That's why many people post in tehs how off boards. Just o feel good about themselves. :/ I feel that's stupid, and maybe rating images will make it worse. There are many problems with rating images. 1. What is the rate in comparisson to? If you get a 1/5 and you are being compared to Alyn for a terragen + photoshop piece, it isn't fair. 2. People should be going there for suggestions on how to improve. Ratings may sometimes make them happy, but the majority of people that want them will most likely get a bad rating. Most artists that have consideable talent don't even want rates, but that is different for people who are new to graphics. 3. Ratings bring up arguments and flames directed to members who are just trying to help. I am sure there are multiple more. Also, isn't this an old thread? I only posted because there was a recent post, but I think this was created awhile ago.... |
|
|
|
Post by Mitchell on Mar 20, 2006 21:39:57 GMT
What I found was most people seemed more concerened about the actual number, rather than the useful comments we gave. What we found... Jerk. Yeah, we hoped that removing ratings would remove some people from the board that were only interested in the number. I can clearly remember giving long, detailed rates with a low number but LOADS of comments and suggestions, and all I ever got was an "Okay", or "thanx", or sometimes they wouldn't even respond and would go on and post something else. Got really irritating. |
|
(That includes your Crest. ;D <3...eh)
