|
|
Post by bratzer on Jan 10, 2006 11:05:45 GMT
Hey yall, I was cruising a bit trough the battle section and i was thinkin....Personnally i find the voting a bit messed up.. you have to browse along many posts to find the correct entree... The idea:Create a new thread for the voting. Both entrees are in the first post and the overview is much better  Bratzer |
|
|
|
Post by eternity on Jan 10, 2006 12:57:03 GMT
I've noticed people usually modify the first post with both etries. Instead of a new thread, why don't we reccomend doing that?
|
|
|
|
Post by craz on Jan 10, 2006 14:26:29 GMT
yes, I would like that alot better! it'll be easier for everybody...if you can do that, kudos to you!
|
|
|
|
Post by Ovi on Jan 10, 2006 14:49:25 GMT
People doesn't do that usually =P But I do it most of the time too keep things tidy. But it doesn't really matter unless you are uber lazy.
|
|
|
|
Post by Assassinator/Young Everest on Jan 10, 2006 17:07:56 GMT
It will be inforced as a new rule soon  Thank you for your suggestion |
|
|
|
Post by Josh on Jan 10, 2006 20:08:20 GMT
Pfft. Talk to me first about things Matt. I feel left out.  I like E's idea much better. Keeps the start duel section clean by moving the threads the way it works now and we can keep the voting as an archive of sorts. |
|
|
|
Post by Assassinator/Young Everest on Jan 10, 2006 20:17:23 GMT
Pfft. Talk to me first about things Matt. I feel left out. I like E's idea much better. Keeps the start duel section clean by moving the threads the way it works now and we can keep the voting as an archive of sorts. Sorry  I was agreeing with E, sorry should of made that clear |
|
|
|
Post by eternity on Jan 10, 2006 21:03:27 GMT
ah ha! the E is useful lol |
|
|
|
Post by Josh on Jan 10, 2006 21:07:33 GMT
Pfft. I was the E as well at one time. |
|
|
|
Post by Happy! on Jan 11, 2006 0:16:19 GMT
lol both are use full don't fight XD. although I find the other E usefull |
|
|
|
Post by (_.·: mǒгø :·._) on Jan 11, 2006 0:26:06 GMT
I agree with Eternity. It would actually be easier to just edit your first post & put the two(or more) images of that duel in there. That way people don't get confused. It would also be very helpful to put [Voting in progress] in the thread's title. I have seen people do this but just wanted to clear it up.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ovi on Jan 11, 2006 4:28:45 GMT
Yeah, but it does make things complex >_<
|
|
|
|
Post by Assassinator/Young Everest on Jan 11, 2006 7:10:32 GMT
I agree with Eternity. It would actually be easier to just edit your first post & put the two(or more) images of that duel in there. That way people don't get confused. It would also be very helpful to put [Voting in progress] in the thread's title. I have seen people do this but just wanted to clear it up. Putting (voting) in the title is standard. I do it before I even move to voting, if your seeing ones without it then they're joshes |
|
|
|
Post by Josh on Jan 11, 2006 20:16:18 GMT
Pfft. I forgot one thread in the past week. |
|
|
|
Post by Luke on Jan 12, 2006 17:11:29 GMT
Guys. It would be much much easyer if you just set up a poll for your battles.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 12, 2006 17:44:34 GMT
Guys. It would be much much easyer if you just set up a poll for your battles. The problem with that is that it discourages commenting all together and people posting keeps the topic alive I do like it when people give some kind of reason, but it's not a requirement. |
|
|
|
Post by Luke on Jan 12, 2006 19:04:18 GMT
Guys. It would be much much easyer if you just set up a poll for your battles. The problem with that is that it discourages commenting all together and people posting keeps the topic alive I do like it when people give some kind of reason, but it's not a requirement. I agree, and have already thought that part out. The member veiws the two battle peices, he chooses which one he will vote for, and then scrolls down and comments on why he chose that peice etc. I gusse. . . |
|
|
|
Post by Assassinator/Young Everest on Jan 12, 2006 20:17:50 GMT
The problem with that is that it discourages commenting all together and people posting keeps the topic alive I do like it when people give some kind of reason, but it's not a requirement. I agree, and have already thought that part out. The member veiws the two battle peices, he chooses which one he will vote for, and then scrolls down and comments on why he chose that peice etc. I gusse. . . There is no way to regulate that to enforce people posting. I'm afraid it just wouldn't work. |
|
|
|
Post by Josh on Jan 12, 2006 20:36:19 GMT
A poll would encourage people not to comment, when we want the exact opposite. Also, being able to know who votes for who helps with security. Matt and myself keep an eye on who votes for who and when, to keep people from voting twice, voting for themselves, or even battling themselves.
|
|
|
|
Post by Luke on Jan 12, 2006 21:19:39 GMT
A poll would encourage people not to comment, when we want the exact opposite. Also, being able to know who votes for who helps with security. Matt and myself keep an eye on who votes for who and when, to keep people from voting twice, voting for themselves, or even battling themselves. Oh alright. Just a thought.  |
|
