|
|
Post by Beam on Sept 4, 2005 16:20:39 GMT
 Yeah i think it would be cool, one gallery, every week replaced with the sigs that were entered that week. You don't need to put EVERY sig in there. Just the top few that ollie rates, and of course specify the winner. I think it's a good idea 
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Sept 4, 2005 16:24:26 GMT
I only have the winners ones uploaded, the only thing I see wrong here is that signatures in a gallery don't look professional against other pieces of artwork.
|
|
|
|
Post by I'm a Kuzu - Uzukami on Sept 4, 2005 16:24:30 GMT
This would be good, but maybe they could do where all the WINNER signatures were posted in a gallery.
|
|
|
|
Post by Josh on Sept 4, 2005 16:25:30 GMT
Yes it would be nice. Have something like this fore every sig:
Artist:
Date Entered:
Oliver Comments:
Sig:
And maybe have a little box on the layout for the actual winner.
|
|
|
|
Post by Beam on Sept 4, 2005 16:25:56 GMT
I only have the winners ones uploaded, the only thing I see wrong here is that signatures in a gallery don't look professional against other pieces of artwork. You can make it all in one folder  It's just there really aren't many galleries to check out. and i'll upload them for you if you don't wanna wast space |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Sept 4, 2005 16:34:53 GMT
I only have the winners ones uploaded, the only thing I see wrong here is that signatures in a gallery don't look professional against other pieces of artwork. You can make it all in one folder It's just there really aren't many galleries to check out. and i'll upload them for you if you don't wanna wast space We use the galleries on the website for the higher quality pieces of art, larger pieces. A little signature section wouldn't really be best placed with the other categories. Space isn't a problem. The sigs that aren't hosted by me (non winners) are hit and miss on whether they work or not. I also don't fancy adding over 60 signatures. Instead, we have a new art group pack out soon, the art group members are updating their galleries. |
|
|
|
Post by Fingertrap on Sept 4, 2005 20:19:12 GMT
ollie's got a point. It would bring down the quality showed on the ssd website
|
|
|
|
Post by Beam on Sept 5, 2005 2:22:17 GMT
ollie's got a point. It would bring down the quality showed on the ssd website Then maybe possibely put the image of the month that is in the herald into the gallery. Or the photograph of the month I would love to see that |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Sept 5, 2005 15:40:46 GMT
No image of the month in the herald, but I could to the features, that is usually done weekly. With the artists' permission.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jonny on Sept 5, 2005 15:57:10 GMT
Or the photograph of the month I would love to see that There's a photograph of the month in the Herald  |
|
|
|
Post by Beam on Sept 5, 2005 18:14:47 GMT
Or the photograph of the month I would love to see that There's a photograph of the month in the Herald I know..... I said the winners should be in a gallery |
|
|
|
Post by Electra on Sept 6, 2005 2:06:48 GMT
This does sound neat. But I think I am going to have to agree with Ollie. It just seems like alot to have to do, when you can just view the winners here. But it wouldn't matter to me either way. |
|
|
|
Post by Ovi on Sept 7, 2005 5:22:38 GMT
I don't think that's a good idea Galleries are for Extraodinary works |
|
