|
Post by icyghost on Jul 22, 2005 2:19:15 GMT
Is there someone who's supposed to approve on such an idea and open a board, etc. to start you building?
|
|
|
Post by Kari on Jul 22, 2005 2:26:04 GMT
This sounds like it'd be a go-ahead, but we have to wait on the approval of the admins.
For the team, why not people nominate themselves and there be two or three main overseers of the project? Three seems to be a good number to me.
|
|
|
Post by icyghost on Jul 22, 2005 2:31:11 GMT
People nomating themsleves? As in signing up, beign approved or disapproved?
3 is a nice number. 3, 3, 3, . . . Or there are three people who control certain stuff/all stuff overall. Keeping thing of control, making Polls for majority votes. One head, who receives all the final copies or rough drafts, table of contents, art, quotes, poems, etc. He/she could edit. A team of editors?
|
|
|
Post by ScottCool on Jul 22, 2005 2:31:18 GMT
I would like to help.
|
|
|
Post by Kari on Jul 22, 2005 2:44:22 GMT
Editing is an enormous job. Maybe a team of sub-editors and then the head editors that get final say. The Yearbook in itself would be a huge task to undertake- I can imagine the team of people being 20+. Some people would be assigned to collecting/writing certain things... All that work on one head would be a bit much...
Thing is, people would have to be reliable and responsible and not pull out of the team when the going gets tough. Also, you can't really slack a lot with a project like this.
|
|
|
Post by icyghost on Jul 22, 2005 2:44:26 GMT
IF the idea is approved, of course (think maybe a day, and it should be)
|
|
|
Post by ScottCool on Jul 22, 2005 2:48:20 GMT
Of cource But I will help if it is approved
|
|
|
Post by Kari on Jul 22, 2005 2:49:11 GMT
Hmm, we'll wait and see what the others think. May need to provide a basic summary with ideas and such- this would probably have to be separate from the Herald.
|
|
|
Post by ScottCool on Jul 22, 2005 2:51:14 GMT
Yes,But how would we know who to put in?
|
|
|
Post by Kari on Jul 22, 2005 2:52:49 GMT
The details could easily be finalised at a later stage.
|
|
Pyrus
New Member
Posts: 49
|
Post by Pyrus on Jul 22, 2005 2:57:03 GMT
this idea rocks, only senior members and professionals should be in the yearbook IMO. or you'd have a kinda big yearbook on your hands aww thats lame ive been around here on and off for forever and a half . i used to be a professional until a accidentally deleted my account what am I rambing about? i dont even know if its gonna happen... i feeling rambling though...hmm pie....
|
|
|
Post by ScottCool on Jul 22, 2005 2:57:21 GMT
It would be dumd to add eer one We add active members.If not I would not be fair!
|
|
|
Post by icyghost on Jul 22, 2005 3:37:40 GMT
Well, they still say 250+. I still suggest on the anniversary of te creation of SolidSnake Designs.
|
|
|
Post by Psionic on Jul 22, 2005 13:50:25 GMT
Well, they still say 250+. I still suggest on the anniversary of te creation of SolidSnake Designs. That would be March '06. If it's done early, why wait? I say Christmas/New Year's is a better time to release it. Course the workload will be higher with holidays around then.. Kari, the nominations sounds like a good idea. Not to sound cocky or anything, but since I suggested, any possiblity of me making one of the main overseers or whatever you called them?
|
|
|
Post by aftervisions on Jul 22, 2005 15:41:52 GMT
Just thought of it, actually. It'd be kinda neat as that way you could look back at SSD's past, plus put the always interesting "Most Likely To..." in it. Of course, I dont mean a real one, but an online one. Maybe even assemble a team of editors, writers, and graphics/coding people to work on it? I know, it's very random. Ahh! I remember I posted something about this back in SSDv3, but nothing really happened with it. If you need help, I'll be happy to lend a hand.
|
|
|
Post by icyghost on Jul 22, 2005 15:51:37 GMT
Geez, I've noticed that a Newbie doesn't get any attention at all. No one reads my posts, and if they do, they argue.
Then if it's Xmas, then it should be all complete by November. The main head should review lightly, then the editors come in.
|
|
|
Post by Psionic on Jul 22, 2005 16:13:51 GMT
Nate, I read your posts and I reply to them. I didn't argue with you, I said that if it's done before Christmas, why make people wait all the way until March. Nick, you probably could help. We've just gotta wait for the greenies to say something about this.
|
|
|
Post by icyghost on Jul 22, 2005 16:34:58 GMT
Oh. I see. How long does it take for the Administrators t oapprove or actually even go on?
1 Main Head 3 Overseers
And editors, people who collect items by advertising all around (Admins can help greatly on that) People who post up a voting scheme for whether things change or not, etc.
|
|
|
Post by Quacker on Jul 22, 2005 17:31:08 GMT
I like this idea, but it will be really hard to put together.
To collect all of the things needed for it will take so much time and work.
I guess it could be done, but it just depends on how much work is put into it.
|
|
|
Post by icyghost on Jul 22, 2005 18:13:48 GMT
And how many members are willing to help. And how many members stay active and don't go on holidays. And how many members are willing to contribute stuff. And how many members are actually working. . . THe reasons could last forever.
|
|