|
|
Post by mukei on May 31, 2007 23:50:35 GMT
Anything goes. Just regular sig size.  AI:  Mukei:  Vote to 4. |
|
|
|
Post by aissd on May 31, 2007 23:54:15 GMT
Me? |
|
|
|
Post by mukei on Jun 1, 2007 1:33:09 GMT
Sure. Voting up to 4. |
|
|
|
Post by xavier on Jun 5, 2007 17:31:50 GMT
AI: First poor sig from AI  There is no focal point the text is ok and I don't like the whole general design. Mukei: I really like this sig your best yet, the blending is really nice the colors, effects and overall look of the sig is great the only bad thing about this sig is minor mUKEI? Mukei or MUKEI would look better. My Vote Mukei |
|
pwnt
New Member
shine thine eyes, for i curse ye to be blind.
Posts: 31
|
Post by pwnt on Jun 5, 2007 20:13:52 GMT
Vote: AI
Mukei's was just... odd. First off mUKEI? That jus tlooks like you tried too hard. It's just all over the place. Same with AI, but the text was fairly good.
|
|
|
|
Post by mukei on Jun 5, 2007 22:27:43 GMT
Vote: AI Mukei's was just... odd. First off mUKEI? That jus tlooks like you tried too hard. It's just all over the place. Same with AI, but the text was fairly good. Can you explain more to as why it looks odd? What do you mean that is "all over the place?" I maintained the flow with a very rigid "up and down" motion. As for the text, I just tried to be a little bit more creative with it than my usual way of writing it as Mukei or MUKEI. 1-1 Keep voting pplz. |
|
pwnt
New Member
shine thine eyes, for i curse ye to be blind.
Posts: 31
|
Post by pwnt on Jun 5, 2007 23:30:54 GMT
Vote: AI Mukei's was just... odd. First off mUKEI? That jus tlooks like you tried too hard. It's just all over the place. Same with AI, but the text was fairly good. Can you explain more to as why it looks odd? What do you mean that is "all over the place?" I maintained the flow with a very rigid "up and down" motion. As for the text, I just tried to be a little bit more creative with it than my usual way of writing it as Mukei or MUKEI. 1-1 Keep voting pplz. Rigid "up and down motion"?  All I see here is a failed attempt at a blurred pixel stretch. Looks odd, as in the colours are mismatched, there are things going around in all directions. Meaning, I don't know what to look at in this piece.. what's the point? What's the focal point? WHY was this tag made? Just to represent you? If so, the only representation I am currently gathering from you is a wash of colors with no significance. |
|
|
|
Post by mukei on Jun 6, 2007 1:12:37 GMT
Can you explain more to as why it looks odd? What do you mean that is "all over the place?" I maintained the flow with a very rigid "up and down" motion. As for the text, I just tried to be a little bit more creative with it than my usual way of writing it as Mukei or MUKEI. 1-1 Keep voting pplz. Rigid "up and down motion"? All I see here is a failed attempt at a blurred pixel stretch. Looks odd, as in the colours are mismatched, there are things going around in all directions. Meaning, I don't know what to look at in this piece.. what's the point? What's the focal point? WHY was this tag made? Just to represent you? If so, the only representation I am currently gathering from you is a wash of colors with no significance. The brushing and effects were in a completely easily viewable "up and down" motion flow. The colors, as well, were in this motion as well. I don't see how you see the colors going in all directions. Pixel stretch? Where in the world do you see that? Are you talking about the layer of the render behind him? That was just two layers or blurring and smudging to help better cover up the area and giving the render a more blended look. The focal point is his back; the entire sig points at it. Why was this tag made? for fun. No tag has to represent you. |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 6, 2007 18:44:32 GMT
With regret, I must announce that this battle has been cancelled due to AI being caught ripping in previous battles and SOTW.
+5 Points to Mukei for participation.
|
|
pwnt
New Member
shine thine eyes, for i curse ye to be blind.
Posts: 31
|
Post by pwnt on Jun 6, 2007 18:59:47 GMT
Rigid "up and down motion"? All I see here is a failed attempt at a blurred pixel stretch. Looks odd, as in the colours are mismatched, there are things going around in all directions. Meaning, I don't know what to look at in this piece.. what's the point? What's the focal point? WHY was this tag made? Just to represent you? If so, the only representation I am currently gathering from you is a wash of colors with no significance. The brushing and effects were in a completely easily viewable "up and down" motion flow. The colors, as well, were in this motion as well. I don't see how you see the colors going in all directions. Pixel stretch? Where in the world do you see that? Are you talking about the layer of the render behind him? That was just two layers or blurring and smudging to help better cover up the area and giving the render a more blended look. The focal point is his back; the entire sig points at it. Why was this tag made? for fun. No tag has to represent you. Every piece of art has to represent something. It doesn't matter your motif's for doing it, it has to do with SOMETHING or another. The pixel stretch is so entirely obvious.. there's nearly no variation whatosever in the signature, aside from the edges where there's this pointless mess of brushing. You claim to give the render a more blended look, but it just makes it stand out in a bad way. |
|
There is no focal point the text is ok and I don't like the whole general design.
All I see here is a failed attempt at a blurred pixel stretch. Looks odd, as in the colours are mismatched, there are things going around in all directions. Meaning, I don't know what to look at in this piece.. what's the point? What's the focal point? WHY was this tag made? Just to represent you? If so, the only representation I am currently gathering from you is a wash of colors with no significance.