|
Post by ishmael on Feb 10, 2009 5:11:32 GMT
Why don't you have a "Member with the name of the best book ever written" award?
Ishmael by Daniel Quinn, you read it and your life will be forever changed.
WITH MAN GONE WILL THERE BE HOPE FOR GORILLA?
|
|
|
Post by Maggie on Feb 10, 2009 5:52:43 GMT
So we're allowed to have two "funny" awards, but not two looks awards (regardless of them being two different things for two different reasons). Seems a little inconsistent. because the 'funny' ones are for a member, and for general. not for two types of the same thing. Actually. it is two types of the same thing. It's two types of awards for being funny.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Feb 10, 2009 6:56:45 GMT
because the 'funny' ones are for a member, and for general. not for two types of the same thing. Actually. it is two types of the same thing. It's two types of awards for being funny. My point went way over your head. so I'm gonna refrain from arguing about something that shouldn't matter.
|
|
|
Post by Maggie on Feb 10, 2009 7:13:07 GMT
My point just went way of your head. I totally got your point. But, you see, there are two things for funny and two things for looks. One is completely different from the other. One is for members, one is for everyone. One is for cuteness factor, one is for sexiness factor. Ya feel me?
It's just the way you worded it. But you're totally right, it doesn't matter at all. I just thought it was a little inconsistent, and I was just being a smart-ass.
|
|
|
Post by ><Lamaenic>< on Feb 10, 2009 12:06:46 GMT
Well see if we just had a general funniest then all the staff would get it. this way members get a chance #hug.gif# That was not at all true but it puts it in perspective #heart.gif#
|
|
|
Post by ufc on Feb 10, 2009 20:18:35 GMT
It seems kinda silly to have one for just members and one for everyone. Plus, they DO have different names, which I think just pushes Maggie's point a little further. Oh, and bee-tee-dubs, you didn't have to be so rude to Mags.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Feb 10, 2009 20:57:28 GMT
I am not having two awards that revolve around looks. it's just stupid. The funny ones actually focuses on TWO different people's PERSONALITIES. which is something I like and support. one for a staff, and one for a member. it's fair. seriously, I'm not arguing about this anymore. I tried to drop it, and yet three of you had to just keep on going with it.
UFC, that was far from rude. the fact that you guys are still dragging it out is ruder than what I said.
drop it.
|
|
|
Post by Saknika on Feb 10, 2009 20:59:30 GMT
Well there's really no point in discussing your contempt with the way the awards are laid out here, Mag and UFC, because if it was a big problem it probably should have been brought up in the other thread from before. It looks like the argument isn't going to go anywhere, and now that the awards are underway it can't be changed, so it's fairly pointless. The best thing to do would be to let it be and discuss it again next year when the proper thread comes around and actions can be taken. Otherwise all that's going to happen is people are going to get angry and there's going to be a lot of hard feelings that no one really needs or wants.
|
|
|
Post by ><Lamaenic>< on Feb 10, 2009 21:18:53 GMT
now that the awards are underway it can't be changed It's Like . . . It's like . . . the JUGGERNAUT!!!!
|
|
|
Post by ishmael on Feb 10, 2009 23:50:00 GMT
We should have this award thing quarter annually. that'd be cool.
|
|
|
Post by Maggie on Feb 11, 2009 0:37:31 GMT
I am a chill doctor. I prescribe chill pills. Kay, do you need a prescription of chill pills? I understand the fact that I probably shouldn't fuel fire right now. And you might think that you're being completely, reasonably logical right now, which I'm not saying you're not, but you need to relax and stop resorting to condescension.
"I'm right, you're wrong" isn't really effective.
|
|
|
Post by Saknika on Feb 11, 2009 1:23:38 GMT
Maggie, you also need to follow your own words and stop putting fuel on the fire. Asking if she needs chill pills is just plain rude. No one is saying anyone is more right than the other, you're all just arguing viewpoints. This has nothing to do with right or wrong.
So just drop it. Because if you don't, I'm sure Kay will just lock the topic and the awards won't be as fun this year.
The argument is pointless. Wait for next year, and bring it up then.
|
|
|
Post by Maggie on Feb 11, 2009 1:31:12 GMT
Saknika, I was using this thing called humor, crude and unusual as it may seem. There's this thing called sarcasm, and actually, I'm using it right now, and it should be taken with a grain of salt. I'm seriously just saying things lightheartedly, and I'm not trying to argue with anyone. Fo' real. Feel free to not think so. But honestly, let's just forget about it starting now, 'kay (Kay?).
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Feb 11, 2009 1:35:36 GMT
It's blatantly clear that across the internet, those emotions aren't tied into things as you mean them to be. Everyone takes your words differently. Sak said all that needed to be said.
so for the final time, let's drop it and move on.
|
|
|
Post by ><Lamaenic>< on Feb 11, 2009 2:55:30 GMT
All discrepancies should be pmed so that no public farces are created
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Feb 11, 2009 3:36:07 GMT
All discrepancies should be pmed so that no public farces are created And honestly, that wasn't your place to state. now, enough with the outbursts. and discrepancy talk. get back to the awards.
|
|
|
Post by Obsidian on Feb 11, 2009 7:48:17 GMT
This should be good.
By the way, if you haven't already, check out my sig.
You shall be rewarded if you do decide to nominate me. ;D
|
|
|
Post by artos on Feb 11, 2009 17:16:05 GMT
I want there to be an award for something akin to "Most Useless Argument," because I can begin to plan the parade.
|
|
|
Post by ufc on Feb 11, 2009 23:29:29 GMT
What's the prize.....?
|
|
|
Post by Saknika on Feb 11, 2009 23:32:35 GMT
A boosted ego and lots of pride. These are things we basically just do for fun. :3
|
|