|
|
Post by TROWLIN' on Jul 8, 2008 1:49:08 GMT
please. anyone. i beg of you.
sig
no bigger than 500x100.
c4ds are for chumps none of those.
cmooooonnnn
|
|
|
|
Post by nrich on Jul 8, 2008 3:59:54 GMT
hosiery
time to open up my treasure chest of brushes and textures
|
|
|
|
Post by TROWLIN' on Jul 8, 2008 5:06:21 GMT
 not a c4d its a fire stock |
|
|
|
Post by nrich on Jul 16, 2008 2:14:22 GMT
 smorris & nrich STR8^ |
|
|
|
Post by Saknika on Jul 16, 2008 3:41:17 GMT
Adams for sure. It's just a lot more visually appealing to me. Nrich, your's makes me feel like it's been scrunched up horizontally, and just makes me feel uncomfortable with such a plain background and rough edges.
So yes, my vote goes to Adam.
|
|
|
|
Post by eternity on Jul 16, 2008 12:25:27 GMT
I like the text in Nathan's - it's very funky. The border is subtle but it definitely works. However, I agree with Sak, the image just seems squished, though maybe that's just how skinny that guy is.
Adam's uses white space very well with everything drawing the eye into the centre of the image. The colours are bright and vibrant and I love the font used. I like the use of flames too.
My vote goes to Adam.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nexxia on Jul 17, 2008 6:00:58 GMT
gotta go with lpg* on this one. Definitely did a good job of drawing the eye to the center, white space is well utilized, all that. Nathan my man. You should have gave yourself a little more room, let those things breathe, am I right? Someone's a little rusty. Though, the text work is great and the composition could have been alright, but damn, so small  |
|
|
|
Post by artos on Jul 17, 2008 16:43:39 GMT
Liters per flush gets my vote.
|
|
|
|
Post by nrich on Jul 17, 2008 22:13:50 GMT
i got rolled
|
|
|
|
Post by gray929 on Jul 17, 2008 23:56:18 GMT
To rub it in more,
My vote is also to lpf. Text + stock + brush = sweet.
|
|
|
|
Post by Knighty on Jul 18, 2008 1:30:16 GMT
LPF doing a hockey sig? OUTRAGEOUS
|
|
|
|
Post by TROWLIN' on Jul 18, 2008 1:37:16 GMT
at least it wasnt by rick |
|
|
|
Post by gray929 on Jul 18, 2008 3:45:01 GMT
at least it wasnt by rick or this guy. |
|
|
|
Post by nrich on Jul 18, 2008 4:37:48 GMT
at least it wasnt by rick or this guy. thank you ted, that was the joke |
|
|
|
Post by Nexxia on Jul 18, 2008 4:50:45 GMT
LIKE A BISEXUAL
|
|
|
|
Post by gray929 on Jul 18, 2008 4:52:07 GMT
thank you ted, that was the joke ha, I thought it was obvious that I was linking to the rick astley vid cuz adam mentioned it, but I guess not. You just got rick rolled, chump. meh, this is gettin old. |
|
|
|
Post by nrich on Jul 18, 2008 5:14:16 GMT
thank you ted, that was the joke ha, I thought it was obvious that I was linking to the rick astley vid cuz adam mentioned it, but I guess not. You just got rick rolled, chump. meh, this is gettin old. and you just missed the blatant family guy reference I had made lololol I'm not dense geez |
|
|
|
Post by gray929 on Jul 18, 2008 5:48:27 GMT
nathan, you're so deep in the closet that you are finding Christmas presents.
something like that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nexxia on Jul 18, 2008 6:32:40 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by TROWLIN' on Jul 18, 2008 17:20:10 GMT
at least it wasnt by rick or this guy. i quite enjoy this song. enough to get rick rolled on purpose. |
|
