|
Post by Luke on Apr 26, 2007 19:33:13 GMT
Largest battle of the season thus far. My vote will go to Project #22329. Danny, you need to lighten up the stock some. Great background, but the overall signature size you chose is the true downfall for me. Flux.exe, way too busy. I really have began to dislike how signatures look cut up. Besides that, there's way too much effects being thrown about with this one. Cut it down, make it clearer and easier on the eyes. `Seventyx, certainly not your best yet. I can see how you screwed up your lighting. And oh my god how many times do I have to tell you to make the text just a little more visable. Project #22329, fantastic layout. I do think its a tad pixelated. Besides that, great work.
|
|
|
Post by TROWLIN' on Apr 26, 2007 19:48:04 GMT
i can see the text perfectly fine...
i don't know what you're looking at.
|
|
|
Post by Luke on Apr 26, 2007 20:38:08 GMT
i can see the text perfectly fine... i don't know what you're looking at. Bah, I don't know. It must be my screen. =/
|
|
|
Post by xavier on Apr 27, 2007 22:59:17 GMT
First of all a four way This could take ages to finish voting two one on ones would have been better. Danny: The layout works nicely stock in the middle effect around the stock and name in bottom left boom, good light colors used and nice simple one pixel black border. Project: Obviously Luke likes this but it doesn't do much for me if there is supposed to be a stock in there I'm not seeing it, it looks a bit random. Flux: I'm not sure whether I like this or the bit on the left doesn't look like it is part of the sig and the stock and/or stocks are sort of transparent but not that is probably the downfall of this sig. Seventyx7: I don't mean to sound harsh but the stock is blended in alrgiht, the lighting is bad and the text and effects aren't great, don't worry you can do better. Vote: Danny (I liked the name Schnooble )
|
|
|
Post by Luke on May 25, 2007 20:36:47 GMT
More votes please?
|
|
|
Post by aissd on May 25, 2007 21:42:02 GMT
Wow, great competition here. Danny: I really like how you have tried to create a focal point around your stock. Great sigs are made that way. The black background is very effective with the brushing/smudging. I would like to see more depth though. Project: All I can say is amazing. You have some great skills man. There is so much going on in this sig that it took me a while to take it in fully. The colours are very well used and blended. I like how you started subtly on the left and built it from there on. This signature screams music. flux.exe: I love your style man. I understand what you are trying to do here, but you have overdid it. This sig would have been a lot better if you hadn't used that heavy grey brushing. Adam: Very well executed man. Great detail. The stock is placed perfectly and the text is also well done. Very, very good signature. My vote would have to go with Project, mainly because of the amount of things going on in the signature. Great work to all of you.
|
|
|
Post by Luke on May 27, 2007 2:53:24 GMT
Current Standings:
Danny: 1 Project #22329: 2 flux.exe: 0 `seventyx: 0
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 10, 2007 22:48:23 GMT
A nice range of signatures here all of a very good standard.
My final vote goes to Project. I feel it's a very interesting looking signature, has quite a messy feel but it works well here, the colours have been used really well.
I thought that Danny's was good, but not so keen on your text there. The image is nicely placed in the middle.
Flux's looked original also, I think you could have had a little more space in the background, it's rather busy looking. It would be nice if that purple outline stood out much more.
Lpf- A good choice of image, I like the colouring but not as keen on the text here.
I'm going to close this at 3, which makes Project the winner. This has been open a while.
|
|