|
|
Post by DBuzzin on Mar 15, 2007 1:36:34 GMT
Schnooble  z i f f y  |
|
|
|
Post by deific on Mar 15, 2007 7:00:03 GMT
Sure. Can be anything right?
|
|
|
|
Post by DBuzzin on Mar 15, 2007 11:25:26 GMT
yeah  my entry  no brushes used again |
|
|
|
Post by deific on Mar 15, 2007 11:41:31 GMT
Heres mine. |
|
|
|
Post by DBuzzin on Mar 15, 2007 13:09:20 GMT
nice il edit the first post |
|
|
|
Post by deific on Mar 15, 2007 19:03:10 GMT
Awesome. Good luck. |
|
|
|
Post by DBuzzin on Mar 15, 2007 19:06:31 GMT
same to you man, I think you got this one  |
|
|
|
Post by deific on Mar 15, 2007 19:07:43 GMT
Bahh, Im not so sure. |
|
|
|
Post by Shockeye on Mar 15, 2007 19:09:48 GMT
I vote for Schoooble because it is so detailed. and also the colors were so good. No things were interfering with the colors and it's so clean |
|
|
|
Post by deific on Mar 15, 2007 19:10:40 GMT
Schnooble: 1
Ziffy: 0
More votes! ^_^
|
|
|
|
Post by DBuzzin on Mar 15, 2007 19:27:34 GMT
Thanks shockeye |
|
|
|
Post by Shockeye on Mar 15, 2007 19:31:56 GMT
You're welcome Schnooble ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Luke on Mar 15, 2007 19:32:36 GMT
Vote: Schnooble
Ziffy, very interesting signature. I'm not sure if I should call them flowers or not, but setting something such as those as your entire background is a big no-no. Also, what were you thinking adding the large white spot near the buttom right hand corner?
Schnooble, your progressing fairly well. This signature is still on the blurry side. There isn't enough of the pink you attempted to add around the render. It isn't a terrible signature, but you have quite a bit of practicing to go. Keep it up man.
Current Standings:
Ziffy: 0
Schnooble: 2
|
|
|
|
Post by aissd on Mar 15, 2007 19:52:35 GMT
Vote goes to Ziffy.
Ziffy, I loved the concept. It took me a couple of seconds to understand the whole signature and I liked it a lot more when I understood the whole concept. I am really liking the colours. The border seems to work very well. The text could be improved. Doesn't fit in at all at the moment.
Schnooble, as Luke said, you are really improving. There's a lot of detail in your signature that can be overlooked. Good job on making Master Chief look in power. The text is fairly well done.
Overall, both signatures were good. However, my vote goes to Ziffy mainly because of the unique style.
Schnooble: 2
Ziffy: 1
|
|
|
|
Post by Obsidian on Mar 15, 2007 22:07:52 GMT
Quite a hard decision, as they are both of good quality. Schnooble: A very nice sig, a good mix of colours, and the effects are spiffing. Good work. Ziffy: A cool sig, the colours work well together, and I like the border. I'm not quite sure what some stuff is meant to be in relation to other bits and bobs, but well done, none the less. Kudos to both of you, but my vote is Ziffy. |
|
|
|
Post by DBuzzin on Mar 16, 2007 14:45:56 GMT
Schnooble: 2
Z i f f y : 2
|
|
|
|
Post by xavier on Mar 16, 2007 20:08:24 GMT
My vote: Schnooble
Schnooble: Your sig owns ziffys, great blending on the stock, good effects and nice text and border one of your best schnooble.
Ziffy:Good effect around the border it's different but the main sig there is too much there it looks like you've over done it.
Good work to both of you
Schnooble: 3
Ziffy: 2
|
|
|
|
Post by Luke on Mar 19, 2007 1:53:12 GMT
Keep the votes coming everyone. |
|
|
|
Post by deific on Mar 19, 2007 6:33:54 GMT
thanks to everyone who has voted for me so far. ^_^ |
|
|
|
Post by DBuzzin on Mar 19, 2007 23:50:17 GMT
same from me I still think you may have this one z i f f y |
|
